aesmael: (haircut)

Originally published at a denizen's entertainment. You can comment here or there.

Large in extent image behind cut )

A new month, so time for a new desktop background. I had been using art shared from other people, but this time chose a screenshot I'd taken in Celestia a few days before.

The perspective is from the surface of Deimos, looking down to Mars below. Much closer than our moon to Earth. If you look along the terminator marking day from night, a white spot is visible. That is Phobos, the other moon, caught in its (less than) 8 hour orbit at a dramatic moment.

Apart from its large crater Stickney (not shown), Phobos is famous for its low and fast orbit, which contrary to that of our moon is decaying lower and faster. When it drops not much lower, tidal forces from Mars will tear it apart and for awhile Mars may be ringed until those fragments rain down upon its surface.

Deimos gets much less love, but perhaps when it is the last moon remaining this will change.

aesmael: (probably quantum)
"What we see today, when we look out at the Universe, is that the farther away things are from us, the faster they move away from us. "

Let's rephrase that. Let's say "the farther away things are from us, the faster we observe our separation increasing". The standard phrasing encourages misunderstandings about the nature of the universe's expansion.
aesmael: (haircut)
Lately have been using this image as my desktop background:

It is an image I took with Celestia two years ago and, coming across again, seemed like good background material.

The main object in the foreground is of course Europa, mostly eclipsing Jupiter in the background. To the left is the Sun, and to the left of that another disk is visible. I recreated this shot in Celestia recently to verify (the time displayed in the image is local to Sydney, so I had to adjust the clock settings in Celestia to get to the right moment, but if you leave them unaltered and enter the time shown you get a shot which is nearly a mirror image of this one) that the other disk visible is indeed Io and not one of the other Galilean moons.

I think it is wonderful that there are places in the solar system we could go and see more than two objects visible in the sky as more than points.

Originally published at a denizen's entertainment. You can comment here or there.

In the past week I have been surprised by two pieces of news concerning Saturn and rings.

First, from the Planetary Society Blog: findings which might be evidence for a posited ring around Rhea. As described in that article, a series of equatorial spots on Rhea bright in ultaviolet light might be evidence of collisions from ring particles orbiting the moon. These particles, if they exist, would occupy a size and distribution which makes them particularly difficult to detect visually directly with the instruments we currently have available.

It seems the idea of rings around Rhea has been around longer than I have been aware of. Apparently they were originally proposed to explain a decreased electron flux in the vicinity of Rhea back in 2005, and I sure didn't realise there was this much evidence already. Would be very exciting indeed to get a direct and definite confirmation about this.

Sadly given how difficult these rings are proving to image, it is unlikely there will ever be beautiful views of the Rhean ringscape. We shall just have to comfort ourselves with the knowledge of something wonderful.

The other news is the discovery of a new ring around Saturn itself. This one, discovered by the Spitzer Space Telescope, is the largest and most diffuse planetary ring yet discovered. The details can be found in this press release. Basically it is very large and very faint, and only detected because of its cool infrared glow. I am concerned that the end of the release specifies this information was gathered before Spitzer ran out of coolant, and whether this means we won't be able to obtain further observations of the ring for a while. It might take us a long time to discover if this ring 'only' spans from six to twelve million kilometres from Saturn, or if that were merely its brightest, densest part.

Apart from the amazement of a whole new feature being discovered, this is particularly intriguing because Saturn's moon Phoebe orbits within this ring and is thought to be the source of its material (via dust knocked off from impacts, most likely). If so, and depending on what else is found, this ring could be a key part of one of astronomy's longer-standing mysteries: the two faces of Iapetus. Although it has long been suspected that material from Phoebe deposited on Iapetus is the reason that moon has one bright hemisphere and one dark (more or less), I think this ring is the first actual detection of a possible mechanism for the transfer of this material.

If that bears out I think I will finally have an answer to a mystery I have been intrigued by since I was a young child; for a long time Iapetus has been one of the solar system bodies I was most fascinated by.

aesmael: (probably quantum)
Lately I have been watching videos we have around the place. Videos which were not much watched when they were new and especially videos which play documentary series and which were gifts from relatives.

I started with one which excited me when I saw the word Cosmos prominently on the front of the case. I was disappointed to discover the title is actually Mysteries of the Cosmos and it is not the famous series hosted by Carl Sagan, a series I have long wanted to see. I thought I'd mentioned that already on my journal but apparently not.

Tonight I am watching a series called Universe. In between, my sister and I watched Amadeus but it turns out that is not actually a documentary despite a) featuring people in costumes and b) playing a lot of classical music composed by someone not involved in the production. So, Universe. Am prompted to be posting now by thoughts inspired from the latter part of the first tape, concerning black holes.

They talked a lot about what happens to stuff which falls into a black hole, how it is inevitably drawn into the singularity and utterly destroyed. The thing is, that does not actually happen, at least from the perspective of an outside observer. The gravitational effect of a black hole is strongly attractive, yes, up close, but like all gravitational fields it also affects time. Watching from the outside we see time pass more slowly for an object as it approaches the event horizon until eventually it effectively stops, and we do not actually get to see it cross that point of no return. From the perspective of an object falling into a black hole it falls right in, but it also sees time speed up in the distance and all the stars go out first.

As far as I am aware this makes no practical difference; mass within a radius is still mass within a radius, but it does make me wish I were more mathematically proficient so I could explore.

Earlier parts of the video gave me an idea for a story too, so that's great. It has been done before and I find I do not actually care about that. Have the characters (been a while since they got a new tale), have the scene. If we get the details then we do the typing.

Time to put in the second tape.
aesmael: (Electric Waves)
They both photograph stars and analyse the image, attempting to discern such information as life history, companions, or time and manner of demise and contribution to future generations.

Profile

aesmael

May 2022

S M T W T F S
12345 67
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 2025-07-11 23:29
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios