aesmael

Reading about this news earlier today I wanted to provide some recent context, if I were to say anything about it. I couldn't think how to express that, so put it down as a matter to gather dates and details for before posting. Then there was this post from Idiot/Savant at Larvatus Prodeo which I think sums the situation up well enough:

The ACT Legislative Assembly has just passed a civil union law, amending its existing civil partnerships legislation to permit public ceremonies. There’s some history here – in 2006 and 2007 civil union laws were repeatedly vetoed by the Howard Government on the basis that allowing public ceremonies (rather than filling out a form and making a declaration in a registry office) would “mimic marriage”. The message was clear: gay couples should stay in the legislative closet, and keep out of sight (and out of mind) of decent straight folk.

The new law gives the finger to that idea, reinstating public ceremonies and establishing a seperate system of civil partnership notaries. Oddly, however, the ceremonies are limited solely to same-sex couples – ensuring same- and opposite-sex couples use different laws apparently being a cornerstone of Australian bigot politics. Even this may not be enough to avoid a federal veto – the Australian Labour Party voted just three months ago to uphold Howard’s ban on gay marriage, and Kevin Rudd personally opposes equality. its unclear yet whether there will be a veto – but given the hostility of the ALP to gay rights, I would not be surprised.

There are plenty of links in the original, and argument in the comments that the ALP can't fairly be called 'actively hostile' because in the past they made sodomy no longer criminal. That's as may be, but in the present they do seem grudgingly hostile at best.