These days it looks a lot like media is shifting. Paper-print being slow replaced with online and new emerging media growing. Even text where it does persist is being cut shorter, people less willing to read a single item for so long. So it seems perhaps those who wish to create had best adapt their craft as popular forms change yet again, and possibilities previously unavailable are opened.
And I do not choose to adapt. There might be a few ideas which take advantage of possibilities unavailable or more difficult in traditional forms, what we mostly want to do is write our long prose stories, even if that is a slowly fading form. And we could be wrong, but we're still resigned to doing our thing even if the winds blow against it being where the future goes.
And I do not choose to adapt. There might be a few ideas which take advantage of possibilities unavailable or more difficult in traditional forms, what we mostly want to do is write our long prose stories, even if that is a slowly fading form. And we could be wrong, but we're still resigned to doing our thing even if the winds blow against it being where the future goes.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-05 10:11 (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-05 11:58 (UTC)From:For any writing that I'd call "functional" - news, descriptions, any sort of instruction, and related categories - yes, the shorter, the better. There's just too much of it all to devote time to reading endless pieces that don't add much information.
When it comes to reading for pleasure, this goal has doesn't apply. All that is contained in the story (however long) is meant to be part of the story and brings important information just by virtue of being there. (If it doesn't, than we're dealing with a bad writer.)
So I don't see people giving up books with the comment "TL;DR LOL" just yet.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-05 13:35 (UTC)From:I look forward to reading you in print, little sister. And I will read your work, of course.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-05 15:12 (UTC)From:And, well, the people who never wanted to read in the first place will now have an exponentially increased amount of options to avoid it.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-05 16:04 (UTC)From: