aesmael: (Electric Waves)
New show advertised recently, Eli Stone. Seemed like fun, a main character having extravagant, perhaps prophetic visions. I thought I would give this sort of show another try after snarling at Medium.

I don't like it. After a few minutes, I realised this was the show I heard about some months ago, in which the opening episode establishes in court that vaccinations using thimerosol (faintly disguised as 'mercurisol' in the show) as a preservative cause autism, and that the company producing the vaccine was aware of this.

I don't like seeing such a charged falsehood presented on television as fact, considering it has been established firmly in multiple studies that there is no such link, and yet there are still numerous parents trying to sue companies which produce vaccines for 'making their child autistic'.

That, and the scene toward the end in which, after the main character is told that his visions are caused by an inoperable brain aneurysm, another character tells him they can have another explanation and perhaps he is a prophet, apparently in a Christian framework (Moses is referenced as an example 'I'm not' 'but God told Moses he would send a prophet to every generation'). The main character says he does not believe in God and gets told "Do you believe in right and wrong? Do you believe in justice? Do you believe in love? Then you believe in God." This sort of declaration that being a moral person is identical with belief in the Christian God annoys me a lot.

Plus, I would have preferred if he decided to attribute significance to his visions on his own.

Perhaps it would have been better viewed as some sort of alternate reality story or fantasy, but I think I would rather not watch a show which seems to have as its primary message that evidence-free belief and decision-making is better than the other kind.

Date: 2008-12-02 17:18 (UTC)From: [identity profile] allieflowlight.livejournal.com
Ah, yes! I knew about this dynamic before (it explains my own social paranoia), but I never made the connection to conspiracy "theories" for some reason.

That's a good point about how seeing patterns that aren't there as more conducive to survival than the reverse. And here I thought superstitious people were more numerous just because they had more kids...

Date: 2008-12-02 17:23 (UTC)From: [identity profile] allieflowlight.livejournal.com
Err, is more conducive to survival.

Date: 2008-12-02 18:04 (UTC)From: [identity profile] pazi-ashfeather.livejournal.com
In a sense, they are. Why do you think they have more kids? ^^

Date: 2008-12-02 22:40 (UTC)From: [identity profile] pazi-ashfeather.livejournal.com
It's not survival that matters in evolution, it's reproductive success. The comment is sort of a joke calling attention to that; it's a joke because mere predisposition to such belief is not necessarily as strong an effect in our selection anymore -- people often have more kids when they're lower on the economic bracket, instead.

Though...being lower on that scale does seem to correllate with a sense of anxiety and nervousness about the world and how possibly-hostile it is...

Profile

aesmael

May 2022

S M T W T F S
12345 67
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 2025-07-16 22:44
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios