lost_angelwings showed me
this presentation. It puts me in mind of a recent idea I had - to count advertisement images encountered each day featuring sexualised portrayals of women versus the number showing men in a similar manner.
It took a while to load for me.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 14:28 (UTC)From:You might explode your brain keeping track of all the sexualized portrayals of women during a day? :(
no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 14:31 (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 14:52 (UTC)From:Hmmmmm. I wonder how the ads look in the Gay press? I wonder whether you'd find more objectified men there?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 15:04 (UTC)From:From what I have heard, depictions of men in gay-oriented magazines map much closer to those of women in the mainstream ones. I never see those for sale though, even when there are pornographic magazines intended for heterosexual men on the rack.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 15:11 (UTC)From:A quick non-scientific look at the ads on their website seems to support the hypothesis of objectified men.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 14:50 (UTC)From:I trained myself to not be influenced by advertising early on and I'm very sceptical about any claims made but it's amazing how much the subliminal message sinks in. I look at myself in the mirror and see a very unconventional woman and the potential is there for me to get very upset because I'll never meet conventional beauty standards. I have to be constantly aware that those standards are created and maintained by the advertising/entertainment industry, and are therefore immediately suspect.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 15:09 (UTC)From:It is fun, though, to pull apart advertising and try to identify the specific levers they are trying to pull, or guessing what the product is.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 15:13 (UTC)From: