aesmael: (nervous)
    Sydney now under permanent water restrictions.

Date: 2007-09-16 09:12 (UTC)From: [identity profile] lost-angelwings.livejournal.com
:O

:(

*gives you water?*

Date: 2007-09-16 09:41 (UTC)From: [identity profile] shelleybear.livejournal.com
One word "Desalinization"

Date: 2007-09-16 10:06 (UTC)From: [identity profile] aesmael.livejournal.com
Also in the news report, the desalinisation plant is still being built. The news tells us taxpayers are supposed to be unhappy at still having to pay for it "even though it is no longer necessary". I can't say I understand that.

Date: 2007-09-16 10:12 (UTC)From: [identity profile] shelleybear.livejournal.com
By rationing water we don't need to explore new sources.
Or
You can be dry or you can spend the money.

Date: 2007-09-16 10:53 (UTC)From: [identity profile] open-other-end.livejournal.com
Great, then we can have hour-long showers and leave the taps running for as long as we like, right? :(

I don't know if permanent water restrictions would be necessary given that our dams have recovered a little bit, but it's probably a good idea to secure our water resources in Sydney for the future.

Date: 2007-09-16 14:25 (UTC)From: [identity profile] shelleybear.livejournal.com
But that's just the point.
You could if the plants were big enough or efficient enough.
Water is water.
The problem is making it usable.

Date: 2007-09-17 09:35 (UTC)From: [identity profile] open-other-end.livejournal.com
Water is scarce in Australia. We've been struggling through a drought that's lasted for more than a decade, from memory? (I hear 50 years possibly?)

The problem is using what we need, and changing wasteful behaviours.

Date: 2007-09-17 12:15 (UTC)From: [identity profile] shelleybear.livejournal.com
Desalinization and distribution.
Purification and recycling.
If you want to spend the money, the solution is clear.
Conservation is always part of the equation, but it is just that.
A part.

Date: 2007-09-17 13:07 (UTC)From: [identity profile] aesmael.livejournal.com
It is odd to see what looks like a disagreement in which both parties disagree.

Date: 2007-09-17 13:07 (UTC)From: [identity profile] aesmael.livejournal.com
Er, that would be 'agree', clearly.

Date: 2007-09-18 08:12 (UTC)From: [identity profile] open-other-end.livejournal.com
It's called being "in violent agreement" :)

Date: 2007-09-16 09:49 (UTC)From: [identity profile] syntaxia.livejournal.com
Oh dear, that can't be good. Come to Ireland, we still have some.

Date: 2007-09-16 20:03 (UTC)From: [identity profile] jessie-c.livejournal.com
We have lots falling on us in Vancouver. C'mon over with sponges if you want...

Profile

aesmael

May 2022

S M T W T F S
12345 67
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 2026-03-20 01:33
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios