Also in the news report, the desalinisation plant is still being built. The news tells us taxpayers are supposed to be unhappy at still having to pay for it "even though it is no longer necessary". I can't say I understand that.
Great, then we can have hour-long showers and leave the taps running for as long as we like, right? :(
I don't know if permanent water restrictions would be necessary given that our dams have recovered a little bit, but it's probably a good idea to secure our water resources in Sydney for the future.
Desalinization and distribution. Purification and recycling. If you want to spend the money, the solution is clear. Conservation is always part of the equation, but it is just that. A part.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-16 09:12 (UTC)From::(
*gives you water?*
no subject
Date: 2007-09-16 09:41 (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-16 10:06 (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-16 10:12 (UTC)From:Or
You can be dry or you can spend the money.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-16 10:53 (UTC)From:I don't know if permanent water restrictions would be necessary given that our dams have recovered a little bit, but it's probably a good idea to secure our water resources in Sydney for the future.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-16 14:25 (UTC)From:You could if the plants were big enough or efficient enough.
Water is water.
The problem is making it usable.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 09:35 (UTC)From:The problem is using what we need, and changing wasteful behaviours.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 12:15 (UTC)From:Purification and recycling.
If you want to spend the money, the solution is clear.
Conservation is always part of the equation, but it is just that.
A part.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 13:07 (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 13:07 (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 08:12 (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-16 09:49 (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-16 20:03 (UTC)From: