:) You said it perfectly. It still frustrates me so much that she's basically declared that it's going to stay the way it is despite changing it to include asexuals. Her reasoning seems to be "I don't know how to word it and still keep my rhetorical style so I'm just not going to try".
Mentioning non-cis ppl is great and all, but it's not enough if you want to be inclusive. Simply remembering we exist is not enough if you can't be bothered with accuracy and respect.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-02-07 19:11 (UTC)From::) You said it perfectly. It still frustrates me so much that she's basically declared that it's going to stay the way it is despite changing it to include asexuals. Her reasoning seems to be "I don't know how to word it and still keep my rhetorical style so I'm just not going to try".
Mentioning non-cis ppl is great and all, but it's not enough if you want to be inclusive. Simply remembering we exist is not enough if you can't be bothered with accuracy and respect.